	On can wonder before the spectacle that proposes us the French television since some days.
A French chain proposes us a spectacle at the very least surprising. It is about the " loftstory " broadcast. This broadcast is inspired by live show American. One selected the people who didn't know themselves to live during 70 days in a house.
This house is filled of cameras that shoot non-stop the facts and gestures of the individuals. There is also some in the rooms and bathroom, even shooting the night by infrared.
They also have the micros permitting to hear them. They are going to spend 70 days spied on by these micros and these cameras therefore.
	Chaque day we have some information by the television with the strong moments. For the more voyeurs, they are in live on Internet.Je me am connected on the site (http://www.loftstory.fr) and the network is often cluttered, what shows or the weak quality of the network, or, what seems likelier to me, the number important of connected.
	Je is also surprised to see that it is guarantied by a psychiatrist who appeared to the first broadcast and that will be for example the good samaritain in case of décompensation. Nearly a full size experimentation.
	Cela ask a lot of questions on ethics. until or can one guaranty cela ?
How far one goes to go on the chains télévisuelles ? How in is arrived us to become voyeur ? Why does this broadcast have allowed summer, it is not in opposition with the dignity humaine ? To when a broadcast that shoots in direct a murder or a viol ?
	Pourquoi to take copy especially on the American in this domaine ?
I hope for all c.ur that himself will mobilize of the associations and will tempt to make bar this.
	On can ask numerous questions. What repercussions will it have on the people who are going to live this expérience ?(the couple winning will have a house in which it will be shot again during 6 months.)
What are the possible impacts on the viewers and notably the more jeunes ? Is it going to develop at home an instinct of exhibition/voyeurisme ?
Could the " joueurs s" choose in knowledge of reason, did they formulate a consent éclairé ? Did one inform them of the risks psychic éventuels ?
All these questions remain suspends some. But the honestly France, country of the human rights and the citizen, doesn't give a good example for the members of the European union. I didn't think that we would happen to it of it.
