Consequence of the research of the power: permanent research of a recognition :

• Permanent research of a recognition and the approval, especially on behalf of the persons responsible ;

One grants a lot of importance to the outside picture to avoid all discount in question and one takes care of the appearances, the "marketing". One endeavors to camouflage our poverties and our weaknesses, to camouflage our sin to function according to the ideas of the world. It is the negation of the Cross, of the power of the Cross. Importance granted to the reputation, to the stocks and functions, to the good presentation - to aesthetics -.

• why, at the time of important events, the Path néocatéchuménal opens out it so many efforts to convene and to gather the most possible of bishops and ecclesiastic authorities of all sorts, of preference holders of doctorates in theologies. the supporting names. , and to gather the letters and legal documents signed by monseigneurs and other authorities écclésiales - as guarantee of validity :

• why such a need to search for to be secured, validated, confimé, does authentifié sans stop? It is true that all photos show us under all angles of the bishops, of the cardinals, and the Pope well often together with the initiators of the Chemin . However, all these photos don't prove nothing at all, these are things to fool the crowds (and the simple member of the community) - it is known well in politics.

• Closed circuit and watched framing ;

• To apply only to the catechists, because them only (especially not the mind Saint.) can guide us and illuminate us. "because they are our catechists and that they have "reçu" : but don't put in practice. 

• Why is there on behalf of the "hierarchy", like a constant and filigreed "warning", a "distrust" to observe with regard to all movements or sensitivities foreign to the Path Néocatéchuménal ? What do you have peur ?

• Why such a hostility with regard to other movements of Eglise ? Also to avoid all discount in question, then, one says that these are of the "mad, of the hystériques" ; so one closes itself to everything that could disturb the catechist who is installed well in his/her/its convictions to be right (is formed "him, he/it knows.."). In the beginning, this hostility is hidden by the invitation of the catechists to abandon this movement since one said "yes" to the Path néocatéchuménal ; then, if one or the other seems to persevere to frequent the "charismatic", one begins to put it on a way of garage by all sorts of hypocritical subtleties and slanders.

However, God gave and continuous to give to his/her/its Church a multiplicity of charismas through different movements and Christian communities. And us, instead of welcoming them (simply through a brother or a different sister, cad of another sensibilité . ), we say that we are the best, that it is we that are right, or in any case, we show it by our comportements ; therefore, we begin to criticize the other sensitivities (orthodox, protestants, . that are yet all of the Christian.), to judge them and to exclude them. And it is it that is unacceptable.

If one considers all different ministries honestly, the Path néocatéchuménal attributes by his/her/its attitude of pre-eminence, and by the attitude of his/her/its representatives (cf. supra & infra) the monopoly of the proclamation of the Speech and the new Evangelism, passing in silence over all others movements of church.

However, the Path néocatéchuménal doesn't detain the monopoly in the church of the proclamation of the Speech and the formation of the Christian, - although these two aspects are developed very at home.

• If the Path néocatéchuménal pretends not to be a sect. and if he/it is not in fact, why himself of it defend-il  (*)? - (cf. p.58 of the fascicle on the convivence to New-York of 253 bishops s / theme "Evangelism and Path néocatéchuménal" - Jehovah's Witnesses will pretend the same thing, of course, it is clear) -

Of the methods of sects to the sect, there is only a step. And no one realizes the deviation so much she/it is subtle and insidious. especially when one is oneself within such a system - The spiritual pride is a slippery slope toward the mind of sect, toward the conviction that the movement to which I belong has the pre-eminence in the church and that the other, them, didn't consist of anything.

This is how I understood the reason of the construction of your building in Israel, on the Mount of the Beatitudes.  In addition, he/it is in construction on the Mount of the Beatitudes, like an irony or a provocation to Christ who pronounced his/her/its speech of the Béatitudes s,: on Words of the Beatitudes proclaimed by the Christ, you, the big of the Path néocatéchuménal, you build with the money of those that you indoctrinated by washings of brains on several years (of initiations, passages and stages of all sortes ), a building, human temple on the Mount of the Beatitudes :

1. as symbol of recuperation human of a grant of Dieu :  You proclaim yourselves God on what escapes - the Beatitudes (*) - to your human control through a building of which you controled the realization minutely (CAO, models, projet .)
2. as mirror of the interior reality (Baal) of notre/votre heart and that that enliven the persons responsible anxious of the picture of the Path néocatéchuménal secretly. It verifies itself besides humanly in all domains, that it is in the church or outside.

• King Nabuchodonosor said, going for a walk on the terrace of his/her/its palace royal ds Dn 4, 27 ,: That step is not this big Babylon that I built, to make my royal residence of it, by the strength of my power and for the majesty of my gloire ?". These words were again in his/her/its mouth, when a voice fell of the ciel : "It is yours that he/it is spoken, oh king Nabuchodonosor ! Royalty withdrew from you, among the men, you will be hunted, with the beasts of the fields will be your home, of grass, as beefs, you will eat, and seven times will pass on you, until you learned that the Very High has domain on kingdom of the men and that it gives it to that pleases to him."

Consequences of idolatry: Hierarchy - Elitism - Aesthetic

• To every hierarchical level operates itself a control of information and the diffusion of this information.

• Why this importance granted to all these ecclesiastic heads, as well as in Kiko himself that one places on a pedestal and that one waters to all sauces ? This importance seems me to be very strongly if need be linked to be recognized constantly by the ecclesiastic authorities, to receive a confirmation to be in the truth because I am photographed in conversation with the Pope. supra cf dawns (4) : "permanent research of the recognition"

• You "adore" Kiko, you grant him the first place in all your actions, outside actions that reveal what happens in your hearts, instead of putting Christ in the first place.

• What is it like community, the community that "chooses" his/her/its members in the shade - by the exclusion in soft of those that are undesirable, as by a sort of "natural selection" - while proclaiming high and strong in the catéchèses that we didn't choose ourselves the some with the autres ? Is it there about an elitism caché ?

• Why this very big disparity between the members of the communities of the beginnings of the movement (poor people of the shacks), and the members of the communities actuelles : physicians, architects, civil servants of the Euro-Market, middle managers, doctorates in théologie : in short a honorable social level and "acceptable" ? Yesterday, you were content with shacks in the poor districts, today, you construct a building on the Mount of the Béatitudes s: remind yourselves that Christ is born in a stall and that he died on a Cross. He/it came among us in the spoliation and he/it died in the spoliation, abandoned of all.

+ the myth of the purity that is the essence of the sects that confounds ELITISM (according to the wisdom of the world) and ELECTION (according to the divine wisdom) and that truly God's call (vocation).

• Concerning the "Only slogan a new aesthetics will save the church" (slogan that betrays the spiritual pride again) extra on the cover of the medicated fascicle of the convivence of the 253 s évèques / theme "Evangelism and Path Néocatéchuménal" : I overtly say that :

After meditation of the questions darned higher than that is not a new aesthetics that will save the church. as Kiko pretends it in his/her/its letter of the 08/09/96 to the Pope Jean-Paul II - but on the contrary, the real repentance of each of us that will be capable to humiliate itself/themselves before God to implore It to grant us the mind of repentance that is the mind Saint, the mind of Truth that will convince the world of péché !

The human being is made thus, that very quickly he puts the hand on God's grants to appropriate itself/themselves them and to pull his/her/its own gloire  of it, through aesthetics notably, because beauty, aesthetics entails compliments, flatteries, congratulations. It is going to glorify the man who will want to return his/her/its work immortal, and one is going to attend notably here the construction of a temple in which one will grant the pre-eminence to aesthetics. To immortalize his/her/its work, the man will be tempted to write down his/her/its name there, and in the present case, the temptation to invite the communities (also "to reward" them of their financial contribution) will have a plate with the name of the community, affixed to a place of the temple.

The spiritual pride is the symptom, the infallible sign of the presence within one or several communities of the mind of Jézabel. (cf infra)

• Legalism: It try to accomplish God's justice while observing some rules, and this add other requirements to those that God established to be justified. In the church the first demonstration of the sorcery, it is legalism. Thus, the negative rules act in the domain of the flesh and feed the thing that they are supposed to warn. The alternative to legalism, it is not the disobedience nor the anarchy that would be more works of the flesh, but it is to let itself/themselves guide by the mind Holy in all aspects of our life. This hierarchical domination attitude presupposes that the members of the community only possess very little capacity, otherwise no, to discern by themselves the teachings of God's Speech. They discern the Writings as one book of rules to follow destinies to produce a "Christian" behavior.

• Legalism is a shape of perfectionism in this case, religious, centered on the setting in practice, or on the repression of some behaviors. It drives a "perfect community", normalized, in search of and by way of consequence, to a cult, an idolatry of oneself through our works. Legalism permits to maintain the system in place, otherwise, it himself désintègrerait by himself.

Ga 6, 12-15 ,: Of people anxious to make good face in the flesh, there are those that impose you the circumcision, to only end d"éviter the persecution for Christ's cross. Because those that make himself to circumcise don't observe themselves the Loi ; they only want that you are circumcise, to boast in your chair .

• The result is a malediction: "All those indeed that ask themselves of the practice of the Law incur a malediction. Because he/it is written: Cursed either whoever doesn't tie to all precepts written in the Book of the Law to practice them. " Gen. 3, 10 ,; and "Cursed the man who confides in the man, who makes of the flesh his/her/its support, and whose heart departs from Yahvé! He/it is like a thistle in the steppe: he/it doesn't feel anything when arrives happiness, he/it sets to the places burnt of the desert, salty earth or no one lives." Jr 17, 5.

"Oh Gallatin without intelligence, that bewitched you?. "Gen. 3,1

The stubbornness and the persistence are the signs of the sorcery and the fruit of idolatry. The obstinate person makes her own opinions (= fortresses) of the idols.

Rebellion = sorcery; God's Speech tells this topic: "A sin of sorcery, there is the rebellion, a crime of téraphim, has the presumption! Because you rejected the speech of Yahvé, He/it rejected you so that you are not anymore a king!" His/her/its 15, 23. The rebellion is the dismissal of God's just direction in our life by which one clears itself of the divine authority.

"Misfortune to the rebel, the soiled, to the oppressive city! She/it didn't listen to the call, she/it didn't accept the lesson; in Yahvé, she/it didn't confide, of his/her/its God, she/it didn't approach. His/her/its princes in the middle of her are roaring lions; his/her/its judges, of the wolves of the steppe who don't keep anything for the morning,; his/her/its prophets are the boasters, of the impostors,; his/her/its priests desecrate the holy things, they rape the Law. In the middle of her, Yahvé is just; he/it doesn't commit anything iniquitous; morning after morning, He/it promulgates his/its right, at dawn, He/it doesn't make defect, but the iniquitous doesn't know the shame." So 3,1-5.

The copyright royalties of this site are recorded before notary
all copillage will be pursued before the courts

00036468